Grade Scale
QR Scores are mapped to action-oriented grades that communicate the resilience posture and recommended response.
Grade definitions
Section titled “Grade definitions”| Score Range | Grade | Meaning | Risk signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90–100 | Sustain | Highly resilient — maintain current practices | Low risk — strong infrastructure posture |
| 75–89 | Optimize | Strong foundation — fine-tune for excellence | Below-average risk — minor improvements possible |
| 60–74 | Strengthen | Adequate resilience — build on existing capabilities | Moderate risk — specific areas need attention |
| 40–59 | Improve | Focus areas identified — targeted improvements needed | Elevated risk — material gaps exist |
| 0–39 | Prioritize | Action required — address foundational gaps | High risk — significant infrastructure concerns |
Using grades in risk assessment
Section titled “Using grades in risk assessment”Grades provide a quick classification, but the pillar breakdown offers more actionable insight:
- A score of 62 (“Strengthen”) with a Device Health pillar at 35 tells a different story than one with all pillars at 60–65 — use Get Pillars to see the breakdown
- The trend matters as much as the absolute score — a 55 trending up over 90 days is different from a 55 trending down; use Get Trend to see the trajectory
Grade in the API
Section titled “Grade in the API”The grade is returned as a string in the Get Score response:
{ "clientId": "osc_x7k2q9_9f8b7c6d5e4f3a2b1c0d9e8f7a6b5c4d", "scoreDate": "2026-03-18", "score": 68, "grade": "Strengthen"}